Government motion passes to take second run at redrawing Alberta’s electoral ridings

The Alberta Legislature in Edmonton.

EDMONTON — A controversial motion to send recently proposed changes to Alberta’s electoral maps back to the drawing board has passed in the legislature, leading the Opposition NDP to accuse Premier Danielle Smith’s United Conservatives of undermining democracy.

“What we’re seeing before us is something that’s never been tried before by any Canadian Parliament, by any Canadian legislature,” NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said during debate Tuesday ahead of the legislature vote.

“It’s not fair and it’s not right. And fundamentally, it is not Canadian.”

The motion allows for a committee of legislature members, with a majority from Smith’s United Conservatives, to be struck to oversee the work of a new advisory panel tasked with reviewing and redrawing by the fall recently proposed riding maps.

That panel will be tasked with rejigging the majority opinion put forward last month by a bipartisan commission that split largely along party lines and came up with profoundly different proposals. The new panel will be allowed to create four additional seats, rather than two as the previous one was limited to when the government started the redrawing process over a year ago. It will bring the total number of seats to 91 from 87.

Smith says the new process is in line with a recommendation from the commission’s chair, who had suggested creating more seats in the legislature to prevent eliminating two rural ridings if the government couldn’t accept that loss, which had been put forward by the commission’s majority while also adding seats in Edmonton and Calgary.

The chair’s recommendation came out of concern that the government would adopt a second set of maps put forward by the United Conservative Party’s appointees, who wrote a minority report with a slew of urban-rural hybrid ridings that critics and other members of the panel warned was a clear attempt at rigging electoral maps in favour of the rural-dominant UCP.

The new advisory panel is to feature the same membership structure as the first commission: a government-appointed chair and two nominees from each party. Neither the chair nor the nominees have been announced yet.

Nenshi has accused the government of using the new process as a smokescreen so that it can at least partially adopt the minority’s maps, and he reiterated that argument Tuesday.

“It’s been clear for some time that the goal here is to dilute the voices of people in Calgary and Edmonton,” Nenshi said during debate.

“The fix is in.”

Nenshi said while the minority’s proposal was insulting to Albertans in the cities — including those in Red Deer and Lethbridge, which would’ve also been merged with rural neighbours — it was also an affront to rural residents.

Hybrid ridings can be unfair to rural areas given their legislature representatives might be more concerned with city issues, Nenshi said.

“The UCP takes rural Alberta for granted, thinking they’re going to vote for them anyway and it doesn’t matter,” Nenshi said.

A UCP cabinet minister and backbenchers dismissed Nenshi’s accusations in debate.

“We have the NDP, again, acting as if the sky is falling and freaking out,” said Assisted Living Minister Jason Nixon.

Nixon argued that the NDP’s opposition to the second review is hypocritical given it had argued in the past to have more ridings to keep pace with Alberta’s population.

“They somehow want to reject Albertans receiving more seats despite the fact the population has grown,” Nixon said.

UCP backbencher Brandon Lunty, who has been tapped to be the chair of the MLA committee overseeing the new review, said he was disappointed the NDP was making the issue so political.

“Instead of working constructively on a solution, they’ve chosen to frame this in a way that risks undermining the confidence in a process that is clearly designed to establish and prioritize the independence of the advisory panel,” Lunty said.

Deputy NDP leader Rakhi Pancholi took issue with Lunty stressing the independence of the new process, saying the government already received an independent recommendation from the majority report last month, but it just didn’t like what it saw.

“(The UCP) simply want to draw the boundaries themselves, and that is precisely what (the motion) does,” Pancholi charged.

Earlier Tuesday in question period, the NDP prodded the government on the boundaries plan, with Nenshi again demanding that Smith’s government admit to drafting the maps for its appointees on the commission, which Smith promptly denied.

When Nenshi suggested it was suspicious the minority maps were done so quickly, the premier suggested the possibility they were crafted with artificial intelligence.

“The members should take our AI academy because then they’d learn how to use the marvels of modern technology,” Smith said.

The NDP also rolled out a new public advertisement campaign Tuesday against Smith’s plan to redraw the maps. It has rented a truck that drove through downtown Edmonton decorated on all sides with a picture of the premier alongside the words “Danielle Smith trying to rig the next election.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 21, 2026.

Jack Farrell, The Canadian Press